The healthcare industry has witnessed significant transformation in today's technologically advanced world. One such revolutionary advancement is the Electronic Medical Record system, replacing traditional paper-based documentation.
This post explores the concept of EMR systems and their different types, from cloud-based platforms to specialty-specific solutions. It also explores the various ways in which they are revolutionizing healthcare management.
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems provide a streamlined and efficient way of accessing patient information, leading to better coordination of care and improved patient health status, satisfaction, and quality of life. By integrating interoperable technology components and features for documenting medical history, diagnoses, medications, etc., they facilitate efficient and secure information exchange within healthcare facilities, replacing traditional paper-based charts and manual workflows with digital files and electronic transmissions. 
EMR Systems support the following group of eight key functions for safety, quality, and care efficiency:
-
Physicians can access patient information, such as diagnoses, allergies, lab results, and medications.
-
Access to new and past test results among providers in multiple care settings.
-
Computerized provider order entry to enhance legibility, reduce duplication, and improve the speed with which orders are executed.
-
Computerized decision-support systems to help improve compliance with best clinical practices and ensure regular screenings and other preventive practices.
-
Secure electronic communication among providers and patients to improve the continuity of care, increase the timeliness of diagnoses and treatments, and reduce the frequency of adverse events.
-
Patient access to health records, disease management tools, and health information resources.
-
Computerized administration processes, such as scheduling systems.
-
Standards-based electronic data storage and reporting for patient safety and disease surveillance efforts.
Benefits of an EMR
The implementation of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system offers numerous advantages, including:
- Improved efficiency in record-keeping and retrieval.
- Enhanced patient care through better coordination and communication.
- Increased accuracy in diagnosis and treatment with access to comprehensive patient information.
- Streamlined billing and administrative processes.
- Facilitation of evidence-based practice and research
Learn more about the benefits of EMR here.
EMR vs. EHR
EMRs and EHRs are two types of electronic health records systems used in the healthcare industry. While both systems store patient data, there is a significant difference between the two. Electronic Medical Records are not intended to be shared with other providers involved in the patient's care as they are designed for use within a single healthcare organization. On the other hand, EHRs are designed to be interoperable, meaning they can be shared across multiple healthcare providers involved in a patient's care. This feature of EHRs ensures continuity of care and enhanced patient outcomes.
Learn more about the differences between EMR and EHR here.
Cost of an EMR
The cost of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system typically includes several components such as software licensing fees, implementation, and customization costs, training expenses for staff, ongoing maintenance and support fees, and potential costs associated with data migration and integration with existing systems. Additionally, there may be costs related to hardware infrastructure upgrades or cloud hosting services depending on the deployment model chosen by the healthcare organization.
Learn more about the cost of implementing an EMR here.
Types of an EMR
EMR systems can be classified in various ways based on different criteria. Some common ways of classification include:
A. Based on settings for which an EMR is designed
1. Ambulatory
Ambulatory systems are specifically designed for outpatient medical facilities, such as primary care clinics, specialty clinics, and physician practices.
Such systems are designed to support the unique needs of outpatient care, including scheduling and appointment management, patient registration, charge capture, and clinical documentation. They often include features such as e-prescribing, lab and imaging integration, and patient portals that allow patients to access their health information and communicate with their care team.
They are also typically more lightweight and streamlined than EHRs designed for inpatient care, focusing on ease of use and efficiency for busy outpatient practices. They are designed to support the needs of individual practitioners, small clinics, and larger medical groups.
2. Acute Care
Such systems are designed for use in hospitals and other inpatient care facilities to support the unique needs of inpatient care, including patient admission and discharge, real-time tracking of patient information, and management of complex medical information such as vital signs, lab results, and medications. They often include features such as decision support, alerts and notifications, and integration with clinical decision support systems.
They are typically more comprehensive and complex than EMRs designed for outpatient care, reflecting the more complex needs of inpatient care environments. They are designed to support the needs of larger healthcare organizations, including hospitals, critical care facilities, and rehabilitation centers.
3. Hybrid
A combination of both ambulatory and acute care EMRs.
B. Based on Specialty
1. Specialty-specific
Specialty-specific systems are designed to meet the specific needs of a particular medical specialty or healthcare organization, such as dermatology, ophthalmology, or mental health clinics. These systems often include pre-configured templates and workflows tailored to the specialty's specific needs. Still, they may lack the flexibility and customization of general-purpose EMR systems.
2. Multi-specialty
Multi-specialty systems are designed to support the needs of healthcare organizations with multiple medical specialties and provide a unified view of patient information across multiple specialties, allowing healthcare providers to access and manage patient data from a single system, regardless of the specialty involved. This can improve efficiency and coordination of care and provide a more complete picture of a patient's health history.
They typically include a range of features and functionalities standard to many different specialties, as well as customization options to meet the specific needs of each specialty. They are typically more flexible and customizable than specialty-specific EMRs and are well-suited to healthcare organizations with multiple specialties, such as large clinics or hospitals.
They can be a good choice for healthcare organizations that need to manage various medical information but still want a unified system for managing patient data.
C. Based on the mode of Deployment
1. Server-based
Also known as on-premise EMR, these systems are installed and run on a server within a healthcare organization's infrastructure. While the benefit of an on-premise deployment is that you have control over the equipment -- that is also a drawback. Medical practices that deploy EMR systems in-house must have an IT expert to maintain the hardware, software, and data it stores. If equipment has a breakdown, it can add unexpected expenses to your bottom line.
2. Cloud-based
In a cloud-based deployment, patient health information is stored, managed, and accessed online on remote servers instead of local or personal computers. This type of EMR allows healthcare providers to access patient information from anywhere with an internet connection and also enables secure sharing of patient data between different healthcare organizations.
3. ASP based
ASP is a type of deployment for EMR systems where the software and data are hosted by a third-party provider, usually on remote servers, and accessed by healthcare organizations over the Internet.
In this model, healthcare organizations pay a fee to access and use the EMR system, and the ASP is responsible for maintenance, upgrades, security, and other technical aspects of the system. This can reduce the cost and complexity of implementing an EMR system for healthcare organizations, as they do not have to invest in and maintain their infrastructure.
D. Based on Open Source vs. Proprietary
EMR systems can also be classified by whether open source or proprietary.
1. Open-source
Open-source systems have their source code available for anyone to modify and use. They often have a more active community of developers and can be more customizable, but they may also have limited support options.
2. Proprietary
Proprietary EMR systems are owned and controlled by a single vendor.
E. Based on Vendor Size
EMR systems can be classified by the type of vendor that provides them. For example, some vendors offer EMR systems for small practices, while others focus on larger healthcare organizations.
